6 Comments
User's avatar
Al Goodwyn's avatar

To those in Congress who insist that Trump should have gone through you on the bombing decision, I assume if he did, you’d be a no.

Next, articulate the circumstances that would secure a yes.

One year, month, week, day until Iran uses a nuke,

has nuke targets in sight,

when pallets of cash don’t work,

terror attack against our troops,

20 attacks…?

And don’t tell me you don’t deal in hypotheticals. Since Trump will have to wait on you, it’s possible that the only acceptable wait we can afford is measured in seconds. So have your answer ready.

Now, ask yourself, is it’s possible we’re currently at that point.

Or let the Commander in Chief be the Commander in Chief. Biden's no longer in office incapable of being decisive and Kamala lost, removing our worry over her fog of booze.

Vaughn Cordle, CFA's avatar

Exactly. When seconds matter, waiting for permission from a dysfunctional Congress isn’t strategy—it’s suicide. Trump acted when it counted, not for politics, but for national security. The left would rather hold hearings while our enemies build bombs.

Al Goodwyn's avatar

It all obstruction and theater.

David L Paal's avatar

Outstanding assessment 👏

Vaughn Cordle, CFA's avatar

The fools on the left—and the useful idiots parroting their talking points—are ideological drones. Indoctrinated, delusional, and unhinged, they worship weakness and slander strength, proving with every word how deeply the Marxist mind virus has rotted their capacity for reason.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 24, 2025
Comment deleted
Vaughn Cordle, CFA's avatar

If Kamala or Obama had done the same strike, the media would be calling it "bold," "historic," and "measured." But when Trump acts decisively, they scream tyranny. It’s not the action they hate—it’s who’s taking it. And yes, their moral compass isn’t just broken—it’s wired in reverse, powered by emotion and detached from reason or any higher truth.